i can't speak for the pv or that company, but if it is as it says it will work fine. as to what is more important the answer is going to confuse you some because neither are more important than the other as you need both. you can't always just go by the wattage either (watts = volts and amps times each other) because if you have need of say 29v for an application and the pv is 26.5v then it just won't work no matter how much current there is. if the general voltage requirements are met is when you can turn your focus to the current. the current of 2 pvs like the am100 will not just be what the imp rating is because the current will be increased firstly due to downconversion (if for example on a 12v output for the cc from say a 24v input like from pvs this would equate to 1/2 the voltage out = x2 the current) and secondly the mppt action will add typically 10% more current. your input voltage will be much greater than 24v as you'll be at 54v. you can power either a 12v or 24v battery system with the sunsaver mppt with 2 of those am100s in series. 54v to 24v would be more than x2 the pv imp current and 54v to 12v will be more than x4 the pv imp current assuming they are aimed at the sun during the day
or simply put properly illuminated. aren't mppt controllers really great!!! i'm not pushing that particular pv on you and you will have to decide what would be good for you to use, but i did use it for example purposes.
if the pvs you decide upon aren't going to be enough then consider a portable remote ground mount for more pvs that will enable you to pick them up and fold them flat to store in the rv. you can make such a thing as this from aluminum angle and stainless steel nuts and bolts. wing nuts are quicker too. it could also be made to be adjustable and not just portable. think erector set and right triangles.