Solar Guppy - All Things Solar Forum

It is currently Fri Nov 22, 2024 1:35 pm GMT EndGMT

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 2 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Kyocera KC-80 failure notice
PostPosted: Mon Aug 22, 2005 12:29 pm GMT EndGMT 
Offline
Catfish
Catfish
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2002 1:01 am GMT EthGMT
Posts: 47
Location: Campbell, CA
I seem to be one of the rare unluckies that received bad KC-80 panels mimicking the same failure as this forum's post for the KC-120 panels (see http://www.solar-guppy.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=233 for more details). Out of 38 panels, seven have failed outright and another handful have low voltage a couple/few volts below the typical. Kyocera shipped me 38 new ones, which initially pleased me, but after I found that they changed the dimensions of the panel which meant lots of extra retrofit work on the roof, I was a little less happy (OK - I wasn't happy at all). The reason behind the panel failures stems from Kyocera changing to a lead-less solder process in their manufacturing facility. Even though Kyocera was a pioneer in the 90s for lead-less mfg process, they still mess up sometimes. If you fall into the unlucky KC-80 category, be prepared for a lot of work, since Kyocera was mum on whether they would pay for the labor involved as well. Some more info :

- Bad Date Code : 2001.2
- Old KC80 dimensions : 976mm x 652mm (38.4" x 25.7")
- Replacement KC80-01 dimens : 1007mm x 652mm (39.6" x 25.7")
- Increase in power generated : 27%
- Kyocera contact : Megan Mullett, (800) 544-6466 x7726 (unfortunately. Michelle Rabieh no longer works for Kyocera - she is sadly missed)

Part of the problem is that Kyocera replaces KC80s with the KC80-1 model. If you have KC80s installed around that time frame - good luck to you.

Larry H

_________________
Imagine there's no oil,
It's easy if you try ...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Kyocera KC-80 failure notice, sequel
PostPosted: Mon Aug 29, 2005 5:35 pm GMT EthGMT 
Offline
Catfish
Catfish
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2002 1:01 am GMT EthGMT
Posts: 47
Location: Campbell, CA
I seem to have been a little premature in my calculations on the power generated with the new KC80-01 based array.

The power generation value is a minimum 40% increase from the old array. Keep in mind that the post-KC80-01 days are a little shorter than the pre-KC80-01 days.

BTW - It appears that Kyocera customer support is completely mum when responding to a request for labor compensation. I suspect that Kyocera has adopted a "mum's the word" replacement stance that only affects owners of systems that suspect and have hard degenerative data and confronts Kyocera with the data. I surmised this position after not locating any information whatsoever on a product recall or even a fine print notice from the company concerning this issue.

_________________
Imagine there's no oil,
It's easy if you try ...


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 2 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Powered by phpBB © 2000 - 2020 phpBB Group

phpBB SEO

© SGT 2002 - 2020 Solar Guppy